NBC’s “AD: The Bible Continues” — Episode 1
Have you been watching NBC’s A.D. The Bible Continues? Are you planning on watching it? I am, and I’m planning on writing about it here each week. Join me! You can catch-up on NBC’s website and Hulu Plus.
We’ll get together here later in the week (I’ll have to watch all mine online on Monday or Tuesday) and try to exchange thoughts, opinions, even questions.
So far two of the twelve episodes have aired; the first on Easter evening and then the second this past Sunday night. The advertisements say that it will be following the book of Acts, chapters 1-10. This should be interesting to see how well that’s done.
First a few general comments before my own about each of the first two episodes:
1) We’re going to have to remember that this is a screenplay. The Holy Spirit did not inspire Saint Luke to write the book of Acts for the big screen, little screen or stage. That means that the writers, directors, and producers are going to have to use some artistic license. I don’t know why Bible movies often have Greek, Roman, or Hebrew characters speaking with British accents; but they often do. I know it’s not “accurate” but I promise not to complain about it anymore. I predict there are going to be a number of things like this that we could point out and complain about; insignificant and inconsequential decisions made by the writers, directors, producers, etc. I’m going to try to look past those things to comment on things I see as more significant.
2) Roma Downey is one of the producers and Roma Downey has a Roman Catholic background. If her 2013 miniseries The Bible gives any hints, watch for Peter to play a major role. More than you non-Catholics are accustomed to seeing (remember, Catholics believe that Peter became the first Pope/Vicar-of-Christ-on-Earth). As a Lutheran pastor, I’m going to try to point out some of those “Catholic” things along the way; not as an attempt to bash anyone, simply because while the Catholic viewers/readers may be familiar with these things, the “Protestants” are not.
Anyway, enough of this rambling. As one of my childhood icons always said “On with the show!”
Low Libido Condition (having reduced sexual desire) commander levitra navigate to this pharmacy Having low libido means that one desire or interest in performing lovemaking. It’s stated there, that many new brand prescription discounts on viagra drugs, claiming to have “better formula” don’t in fact have it. This is a true fact that it is equally effective as its counterpart brand drug. generic viagra prices We find out to find out more viagra ordination additionally live in a general public where the numerous individuals take a backing of sexual action to lessen their anxiety, involvement in their entire day.
Episode 1/The Tomb is Open
CAIAPHAS: I liked how sincere he was, I’ve never thought of him that way before. While I’ve always thought of him as an irreligious hypocrite, A.D. depicts him as someone sincerely concerned about preserving the Jewish faith. While he accuses Jesus of manipulating prophecy, we’d maintain that Jesus understood the prophecies correctly and that it was Caiaphas who misunderstood.
PETER: I’m watching to see if his role increases beyond what is recorded in Acts. In Roma Downey’s Son of God he could make Jesus appear by consecrating bread and wine then breaking the bread (Jesus actually materialized when Peter broke the bread).
PILATE: Arrogant! Proud! Condescending! Just as a Roman should be! I liked how he played Joseph of Arimathea against Caiaphas
MARY: Check other blogs for controversy about how old she is. Most other movies select a younger woman to play this role. In this first episode she is the “leader of the faith”, reminding everyone of Jesus’ promise to rise again.
TWO WORDS OF CAUTION:
1) “The Stone.” I will be nitpicky with the beginning of the resurrection scene. Light was coming from within the tomb, then the angel rolled the stone away. This might be a common misrepresentation of Easter morning; that Jesus rose from the dead but waited (or was He stuck?) in the tomb until the angel opened it for him. He went to Hell and back, He cannot be contained by a large stone. The angel opened the tomb so that we could see its emptiness, not so that Jesus could escape. I’m sure I’ll see how this played out as the second episode opens.
2) “A New Religion.” From interviews I’ve seen online, I’m worried that the Good Friday/Easter event is going to be depicted as the start of a” new religion”. You’ve probably seen or heard this before, the notion that Jesus and His disciples were the founders of Christianity. No they were not! (Well, at least the disciples weren’t.) Christianity—faith in God’s promised Savior—goes back before Adam and Eve stood before God in their fig leaf undies. The Hebrew people were waiting for “Messiah” (in Greek that’s “Christ”). Easter and the history of Acts is not the account of a new idea; it is the fulfillment and spread of what Adam, Eve, Abel, Noah, Abraham, Sarah, Moses, Ruth, David and all our other Old Testament brothers and sisters in Christ were waiting for. Keep an eye out for this as A.D. progresses.
Agree with my thoughts? Disagree? I’ll end my comments here in hopes that you’ll chime in on either episode in the comments down below. I’ll try to check back in later and, God-willing, will be back next week.
7 Comments
Jayson Elliott
Nice review! It’s cool to read and talk to someone that is “in the know” on something like this, especially for someone like me that is so new to my own faith. I’m always so weary of seeing these shows and miniseries because you never know how accurate they may be or how many dramatic liberties the creators are going to take. I do wish that the beginning of this series would have taken a little more time to introduce me to the people and who they are. Caiaphas, for example…for me personally, I’m just unsure who he is and what’s going on with him. But that’s because I haven’t had the Bible or faith in my life for more than just a few years now. But thanks for doing this, Tony! Last we spoke about this I wasn’t sure you were going to…but I’m glad that you are and happy to read your thoughts…it’ll help me follow along even better. Are you letting the kids watch it? Dawn and I have decided to let Lexi and Brady watch…and just in watching episode 2, we gladly were able to come away with a teaching point (for myself as well as the kids…) When (I think it was) Thomas came in after Jesus had appeared before everyone else and broke bread with them…but he disappeared just as Thomas came in….but then he came back after Thomas had doubted them all for having actually seen Him….Jesus said something to him (along the lines of, I’m sure I’ll miss the exact words) “Now that you have touched me with your own hands and seen me with your own eyes, do you believe?” And of course, Thomas said “Yes”…and Jesus followed that up with “Blessed are those that have not seen me but still believe.” That rang as powerful with me as anything I’ve read in the good book and I had a chance to ask Lexi why that was so important, the words Jesus had just said…and who he was talking about. She confidently spoke up and said “He’s talking about us.” Makes a Christian father proud when my 7 year old understands things in life that many people multiple times her age tend to forget.
Ok…end of my little story for ya…thanks for the recap and I look forward to reading more and discussing with you in person!
Tony Pittenger
Hi Jason.
No, my kids (my younger ones) aren’t watching it but that’s only because if they aren’t in bed before 9:00, I’d go broke trying to pay reparations to their teachers. I’m glad you told me your’s are, I’ll try and keep kids/parents in mind as I write.
Yes, the characters can be confusing and the show does assume a familiarity with them. Hope this helps:
Caiaphas is the high priest whom the Roman government appointed. His father-in-law is Annas (two older guys keep barging into his house–his father-in-law is the one with the bigger nose). Annas was high priest chosen in the Jewish way, but at some point in time the Roman government deposed him and selected his son-in-law to be high priest. This gets at the tension between Rome and Israel. Rome was powerful enough to do this but the the Jews were zealous enough to make it a headache for Rome. I’ve always assumed a cozier relationship between Caiaphas and Rome, he seems to be the guy/do the things Annas wouldn’t. Somehow he was chosen when his Annas was found to be unsatisfactory. Still, I like the tension between Caiaphas and Pilate. They’ve built enough anger and frustration into the story line that when Stephen is stoned and Saul starts making arrests it won’t be coming out of left field.
The ascension scene was good. In reality it happened 40 days after Easter. Thomas happened 8 days after Jesus appeared the the rest of the disciples. The show seemed to compress the time between all these events. Before I complain too much; directors/producers have to make cuts and decisions somewhere. A good reminder that these shows/movies are nice but to get the facts we’ve got to open that Good Book.
Keep the faith my Brother!
Hedy Manuelson
Hey Pastor Pittenger, I really enjoyed reading your views and look forward to seeing the rest of them, don’t know if you remember me as it has been a long time since I have been back to good ole P.O. Please remember me to the Hokanson’s, Howson’s and any one else that remembers me. Love to all from East China Michigan
Tony Pittenger
Hi Hedy, of course I remember. Glad you enjoyed my ramblings. I will pass your greetings on. God bless; He is Risen!
Pingback:
Pingback:
Pingback: