The Bible Miniseries Review: Part 1
Growing up, I never knew how to picture people from the Bible. The Old Testament stories I learned made the people of the Bible seem so different. It was hard to sketch a mental picture of people like Noah, Abraham, and Moses – they just seemed so unreal and unfamiliar to me. Don’t get me wrong – I fully believe they were real people to whom God spoke. I just tended to picture them like the illustrations in Sunday school materials, not as real life people.
That’s what made The Bible: Part One so interesting. These characters finally came to life. No longer were they only recorded on the pages of Scripture. No longer were they confined to a relatively unimaginative imagination. We saw an idea of what these main players in the Bible were like – their mannerisms and emotions, their struggles and joys, their doubts and their faith. The portrayal of these players in the Old Testament was, in my opinion, largely faithful to Scripture while allowing for some creative license.
To be sure, The Bible: Part One had its share of inaccuracies. For instance, in this depiction, the rainbow appeared before the flood waters had receded (cf. Genesis 9:12-17). Abraham and Sarah did not have their names changed by God (cf. Genesis 17:5,15). The number of Israelites in the Exodus was not nearly enough (cf. Exodus 12:37-38). These and other mistakes were relatively small slip-ups.
However, there were some larger areas of disagreement with the Bible. The Bible does not mention a slaughter of the Sodomites by the angels of the Lord, yet we viewed an action sequence reminiscent of Gladiator. Another example was found in the sacrifice of Isaac. Genesis 22 tells us that Abraham traveled three days to get to the place of sacrifice, but we saw Sarah frantically scrambling up a nearby hill to save her son. Likewise, a rivalry between Pharaoh’s son and Moses is not recorded in God’s Word, yet this rivalry played a prominent role in the depiction of the Exodus.
Keeping the 8th Commandment in mind, we don’t assume that the directors and producers have no regard for the Bible. On the contrary, the production team must care very much for the Bible, since they have spent time, money, and energy on this large undertaking. Rather, we can attribute many of these discrepancies with Scripture to artistic license, a penchant for drama, or time limitations. Our culture is one that demands entertainment, and the production team thought some embellishment or added drama was needed to keep people entertained. Also, imagine the difficult decisions that went into this project, which essentially consisted of taking a 2,000 page book and condensing it into less than ten hours of television. Some corners had to be cut in order to fit the given time frame.
If you add this drug to your list as well, researchers have found out that this summer fruit can have a levitra low cost like effect on your blood vessels. There are two tubes of spongy tissue run along the bottom are called the Corpora Spongiosus, which make up online levitra canada the underside of the penis and the glands. Chinese herbal medicine like Diuretic and Anti-inflammation pill can bring into a good improvement on buying cialis cheap thought about this patients’ immune system, and it can return back patients a good healthy condition in essence. However, when a person comes under stress or pressure, which may include feeling tired, bored http://www.learningworksca.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/LW-quantum-leap-webinar-3.pdf cialis 40 mg or distracted, these eleven performance risk factors can hinder effectiveness and erode the quality of relationships with clients and colleagues. That being said, the majority of The Bible: Part One was faithful to Scripture. Of particular interest was the portrayal of these main characters in the Bible, especially during key moments. Imagine what Sarah must have thought when her husband said, “God told me to move to a distant country. I don’t know where, but we’re going.” What was Abraham’s initial reaction to the command to sacrifice Isaac? We know he got up early the next morning and obeyed (Genesis 22:3), but there must have been some doubts and questions running through his mind. Or what about Isaac on the altar – did he struggle, or was he passive throughout the whole experience? The Bible doesn’t tell us what these people were thinking at such key moments. It simply highlights their faith in God’s promises. But I was fascinated by how the producers and directors of The Bible depicted these key moments of faith.
For me, that is the real pull of this miniseries. Any large-scale portrayal of the Bible will have its mistakes and inaccuracies. That’s almost expected. But seeing these characters come to life, seeing how others picture these heroes of faith, and comparing that with our own ideas about these people is what this series brings to the table. More importantly, a series like this one must drive us back to the words of Scripture. We must diligently re-read these accounts to build up our faith and enhance our understanding. Combine this series with a careful rereading of these great accounts of the Bible, and this is a miniseries worth watching.
For a printable version of this review click here.
What did you think of The Bible Miniseries: Part One? Join the The Bible–Bread for Beggars Discussion Group to share your thoughts and questions.
Download this week’s reading guide: Reading Guide Week 1–March 3.
Be sure to check out more The Bible Miniseries: Resources.
4 Comments
Perry Lund
Given the board of consultants include Joel Osteen, Rick Warren and T.D. Jakes – and having heard from many WELS / confessional Lutheran pastors today who watched the 1st episode, I would say there is some real danger in watching this material without discernment. Especially youth and teenagers without the correct guidance could easily absorb some wrong ideas from the bad theological bend.
That being said, it might potential be used in a Bible study setting where people can learn discernment and discuss the reality of the events portrayed in the light of God’s Word.
Pingback:
Katie
I agree with and promote one sentence in your post: “We must diligently re-read these accounts to build up our faith and enhance our understanding.” ….Ironically, if people would do that…they would have to disagree with the rest of your post.
This mini series is a dangerous snare for an ignorant generation. The producers of this show have no reverence for the Word of God and are guilty of slander.
My review of Episode one: http://ioncewasblindbutnowimsaved.blogspot.com/2013/03/episode-1-beginnings-honest-review.html
My plea to fellow believers: http://ioncewasblindbutnowimsaved.blogspot.com/2013/03/history-channel-miniseries-unfruitful.html
Pingback: